Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Muhammad (no images)

This should probably be closed as a speedy snow. Jmlk 1  7  19:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It was already was and then discussion suggested it should be reopened to make sure that the strenght of feeling was measured and registered (or something like that). --Fredrick day (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Given that this kind of idea is proposed again and again, a strong statement on its acceptableness by the community will be an invaluable reference for future discussions. There's no harm it letting it stay open, and editors are generally happier when they have a say, even when the result isn't in much doubt. Wily D  20:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Very good point Wily. Jmlk  1  7  20:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Better to let it run full course. The other thing to watch is that this vote discussion will probably get publicised outside Wikipedia and will probably draw a lot of meatpuppets. The normal policies should be emphasised. DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Let it run and let's use this opportunity to show that we can still stand together when our core values are being disputed. EconomicsGuy (talk) 20:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)