Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Myanmar Historical Research Journal

Discussion
Why neglect Burmese editors' opinions ? Is Wikipedia the Western-dominated encyclopedia? Lol shame on you. 49.237.34.120 (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright, Randykitty! you win the argument! I must admit that you possess a remarkable level of knowledge about Myanmar, perhaps even more than all natives. With such expertise, I believe you should consider pursuing a Ph.D. degree and dedicating your time to contributing to the academic discourse. In my opinion, it would be a much better use of your talents and potential than spending your time on Wikipedia. While you may not feel any shame for your poor work, I certainly feel. 49.237.39.56 (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * , I disagree with your decision on the AfD discussion. I think you closed the discussion without considering the defense comments made by Burmese editors. It seems to me that your decision was hasty and not well-considered. I would like to know what the community value of these unresearched AfDs is. In my opinion, it would be more beneficial to the community to thoroughly research and consider each article before making a decision. Note that we are all volunteers, and no one is doing business on Wikipedia. Aren't you ashamed of expelling Burmese editors? Best. 49.237.39.56 (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * , I provided Burmese language sources in the AfD discussion, but you still opposed them, claiming that they were not reliable or independent!! blah blah!!!. It's truly shameful that you would dismiss valuable references in such a way. It seems like you rely too heavily on the imperfect translations of Google translate, leading to inaccurate assessments. This is like calling "a lion to a dog" - there is a clear difference, yet you refuse to see it.  "Look at that, it's a lion!"; No, it's just a dog," replied the skeptic. Well, you are overly confident in your knowledge of Burmese history, perhaps you should consider putting the "Hmannan Yazawin," the main chronicle of Burma, up for AfD with the reason of a lack of sources. I know you are a superman. Keep up your destroy work. Thanks 49.237.39.56 (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * hello prof, as you are my old acquaintance on Wikipedia, I would like to kindly advise you to focus on your own Polish projects and avoid making negative comments about Myanmar without proper knowledge. I remember in the past, you had a tendency to destroy fictional character articles on Wikipedia, and I believe that adding a more positive approach to your thinking can benefit the community. 49.237.39.56 (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It is important to remember that what goes around comes around. If you make an unfair decision, the karma will eventually catch up with you. In the case of the AfD discussion, several senior Burmese editors who are leading members of our project participated, and they are the pillars of Burmese article creation on En-Wikipedia. It is important to note that they never create articles about non-notable subjects. As natives, we have a clear understanding of what is notable and what is not, and our opinions should be taken seriously. It is concerning to me that your team appears to be attempting to bully Burmese editors using your weight and power. The MHRJ article is clearly notable, and there are plenty of sources that can support its inclusion. However, it was deleted despite strong "keep" votes from senior editors. It feels as though you are trying to impose your judgment on Burmese-related articles, even though the Burmese editors themselves are opposed to this. In the future, I urge you to take the opinions and expertise of Burmese editors seriously, and to approach AfD discussions with an open mind and a willingness to learn from those who are intimately familiar with the subject matter. Doing so will benefit the Wikipedia community as a whole. Thank you for your attention to this matter. 49.237.39.56 (talk) 17:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm one of the oldest Burmese editors and created more than 500 articles on en-wiki. Please note that my letter is a sincere heartfelt explosion of my disappointment with what I perceived as an unfair judgment. I did not intend it as a personal attack. 49.237.39.56 (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please log in, and if you think the close is wrong you're welcome to file a deletion review Star   Mississippi  01:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't login my account bcs i forgot my password about 3 months. I'm not interest to file a deletion review bcs i need to remember that how you're useless and biased. 3 keep votes: 1 merge, and then you merged!!! Amazing... decision!!! Lol How shameful you are. "God must call you on behalf of User:DGG". 49.237.17.92 (talk) 06:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Policy>count. Drop the personal attacks or you're going to get blocked. Star   Mississippi  13:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * My words are not included PA. Someone is refused to accept my words bcs it's truth. What I said was close to the bone for him. So like the stick falls on the sore. lol 49.237.9.9 (talk) 14:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * how you're useless and biased is a personal attack. Either file a deletion review, or move on. Star   Mississippi  14:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I have semi-protected this page. Talk pages, especially talk pages of an AfD, are not for this kind of ranting. This should give 49.237 some time to cool off. --Randykitty (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * thank you, I was about to file an ANI mostly because rangeblocks are far too complex, but you've saved us both the headache. Star   Mississippi  14:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)