Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nadeea (2nd nomination)

I am starting the process of adding better references. I assume references by large online news sites, blogs, celebrity and art event news, etc. are relevant? Btakita (talk) 06:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sort of. See WP:RS.  Blogs are not generally accepted as reliable sources.  Dismas |(talk) 07:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * However blogs written by professional writers are acceptable. I'm not sure what your reservations are regarding their reliability? Can you be specific? Can I get other opinions on this? There's lots of evidence of notability all over the place. There are entries written by different people, subject to editorial. She has a large fanbase, music distributed by a major distributor, and has walked the red carpet (with published photographs) at numerous notable events. She has attained a degree of fame. You keep on sending me to rules while you are being extremely vague. How do you even have a case? Also, doesn't the AFD require a consensus? Btakita (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm comparing Nadeea's page with other music artists already on wikipedia. Haujobb Frontline_Assembly Lab_Report They have far less reliable and notable citations. Why are these pages ok but not Nadeea's? Btakita (talk) 19:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Nadeea was also on the Jimmy Kimmel show . Having the AFT on top of the page looks really bad. Can we have some discussion and a resolution to this? I can pull up more music artists who are less notable than Nadeea but are ok to be on wikipedia.Btakita (talk) 19:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The AFD template will come down in a day or so when the voting closes. It doesn't matter how it looks.  What does matter is that you demonstrate that she's notable.
 * If there are "entries written by different people, subject to editorial" then those are the sources you need to be looking towards. Simply appearing on some red carpet doesn't guarantee notability.  And as far as keeping this page because other articles exist is not a strong argument for inclusion.  Dismas |(talk) 21:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

The bottom line is nadeea is well-known. She is all over google,yahoo,etc. Google nadeea,nadeea music,etc. Nadeea has 20 sets of pictures on wireimage,and wireimage only puts pics if you are a celebrity. Nadeeas pictures are in Life magazine as well. It seems to me that at this point you are orchestrating a personal attack on the artist. Could this be because of nadeea being Jewish? I strongly believe so. This is a clear case of discrimination,and it doesn't look good on Wikipedia. At this point there are articles that are actually wondering why nadeea doesn't have a Wikipedia page,and this is absolutely unacceptable. I would suggest taking a legal action.Kimyamaguchi (talk) 19:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Stop saying "She belongs here!" and prove it. That's the reason for the AFD, her notability hadn't been demonstrated.  Dismas |(talk) 21:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)