Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Newbridge Navigator

I was in the process of closing this when Ritchie333 closed it before I could, so I'll just record my thoughts here for whatever they're worth. I was going to suggest that User:Kimdino/Newbridge Yachts be moved to draft space, and Newbridge Navigator be merged into that draft (and deleted from mainspace for lack of WP:N. That will give people time to continue to research things and find better sourcing for the draft.  Once we have sufficient sourcing to establish WP:N, then it could get moved back to mainspace, and Newbridge Navigator recreated as a redirect to Newbridge Yachts.  I don't think the current No Consensus close was the best result, but don't feel strongly enough about it to warrant anything beyond my note here.  -- RoySmith (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll give you my thoughts. The AfD had been relisted twice, so a third relist wouldn't have been ideal. SpinningSpark gave a reasonable argument to keep, Sandstein said "nobody adds the sources after three weeks of AfD, it's unlikely that anybody ever will" which I don't think is a particularly strong argument, and Sam Sailor gave a reasonable argument to delete. Given earlier discussions, I concluded we had run out of time and we weren't going to get a consensus this time round. A NC result, of course, means somebody can open a fresh AfD at a later date. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:41, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Just to note that, contrary to Sandstein's "nobody...ever will" add sources, the article now has three refs and other improvements. Pinging User:Kimdino who should have been pinged during the AfD and seems to be in the best position to do any expansion/merging. SpinningSpark 16:06, 3 October 2018 (UTC)