Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nick Berg conspiracy theories (3rd nomination)

Don't delete. Of course it's still important.I have been wading the murky web waters for relevant material on this. Wikipedia has some of the more detailed and sane sounding information. I am tired of any linear progression of logic being called conspiracy. Are we just supposed to quit thinking or considering possibilities? The truth surrounding this matter is probably beyond anything the average person would care to speculate on. If it makes people more comfortable, maybe they can pretend they are thinking of a plot for a novel. The shift in responsibility takes away the guilt associated with actually having to put blame somewhere for awful things, God forbid. Try this one on for size. Superimpose Hick Berg's head over Adam Pearlman's. Same person? 24.130.27.26 22:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Lady Lago Elsinore

this is absurd
deleting this article is absurd. it involves Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Benjamin Vanderford. this article has validity. if we're going to have Paul is Dead, we should have this article too. Kingturtle 06:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)