Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Noah Kirkman

The story is NOT the bio of a minor. Noah is the subject of not insignificant media coverage in two countries. I doubt "privacy" is an issue. And the legal controversy will in time prove to be landmark, never has there been a situation where the child of a non-American and non-resident national, is held by a court for 2 years without having done so WITHOUT the request of a family member. And is a child who in fact has a full and responsible family back and in law should have been released to them long ago through child care services in the neighboring country. That country, Canada sharing the same common law judicial system and expending as much government money if not more that Oregon state on caring for its kids. As far as "one sided" well, the fact is that there is only one side, the right side. And the right and moral side, legal side finally, Noah is a Canadian citizen with an extended Canadian family. He should have been sent immediately to Canada. And like any Child he, Noah, belonged with its family, the mother first, and if that is not possible the grandparents, aunts or uncles. Of which Noah has in abundance.

As for Noah not becoming a significant individual. Well I guess the same could be said for Terry Fox, he died before he finished crossing Canada, yet not finishing did not matter, the message matters. And in Noah's story there is a message. So maybe it should be allowed to exist until such time as we see what happens around him. I and others have a feeling that this story is not over yet.

And by way of Wiki policy, why then is this profile still around, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maher_Arar - Arar got his 10 million and has not been seen since. Is Wiki waiting on him to do something significant??? Its been years, and so far he has done nothing.

I say leave the story and build on it. There is more to come.

A Jew in Greece