Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Novas Software, Inc.

I don't understand why this entry would be considered 'spam.' There is no 'advertising language' present in the entry. Why is this entry considered for deletion while entries for other EDA companies (such as Mentor Graphics, Synplicity, Synopsys, and lots more) have entries that are a lot more 'advertisial' in tone than this specific one?

I would appreciate an answer. I think this entry is unfairly being considered for deletion.


 * I suggest you place a "keep" vote on the project page, since you are in favour of retaining the article. Fairness is decided by the community as a whole with regard to the various comments left there, also with regard to the article itself, and the general ethos of wikipedia.  Other articles are not considered relevant when deciding upon an individual nomination.  If you view pages are advertorial yourself you are perfectly entitled to nominate them yourself, too.  Fiddle Faddle 17:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)