Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Occupational Health Science (journal) (2nd nomination)

A few days ago I made a donation to WP because I believe in the mission. But after the disagreement about Occupational Health Science (journal), I think I am going to step back for a while. I am angry about the high-handed treatment I received. I will probably return. But for now, I'm out. Iss246 (talk) 01:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I curious to know what you call 'high handed' treatment. See Help:My article got nominated for deletion! in particular. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I stepped back. I took a one-month break from WP because I was angry about the deletion of the Occupational Health Science (journal) entry. I worked hard to make it a solid entry. Today is my first day back. I saw your comment a few minutes ago. I respond. I did all I could to improve the entry. When an editor said there were too many citations from SOHP website or the publisher's website, I added citations from books and articles and reduced the number of citations from SOHP and the publisher. I published the latest impact factor, which was comparable to the impact factors of a number of other journals. When an editor said it was not indexed in PsycInfo, I found that it became indexed in PsycInfo. But then PsycInfo wasn't good enough for the editor. I don't know if this satisfies your curiosity. I am fed up with some of the destructive editing that goes on. Iss246 (talk) 19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)