Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Olabisi Johnson

@reddogsix - Reference to WP:GNG as quoted by you, how do you define "significant coverage in reliable sources"? Are you suggesting that a major national newspaper with over 100million daily readers is not a reliable source within its area of coverage? If a readership of 100 million is not deemed "significant", please tell me what would be considered significant by your standards. So far, it has been proven that contrary to your earlier position, the subject is notable enough for inclusion. It has also been proven that The Nation Newspaper is one of the 3 largest and most widely read newspapers in Nigeria (with a population of over 180million) and by extension, all of Africa and by virtue of this, it qualifies as a reliable source with significant coverage. Your initial claim of insufficient references has been dismantled. Your assertion that the subject only received single-line mentions in the cited sources has been disproved. What other reason do you have for recommending this article for deletion? Lyteon01 (talk) 12:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * @Lyteon1 -  Significant coverage is certainly not a brief mention or two in a article.  As I have stated,  there are no in-depth, non-trivial mentions of the individual in the the sources included.  There have been no dismantling of statements and they are not my standards, they are Wikipedia's.


 * The article has been moved to AfD where the community will have 7 days to comment on if it meets Wikipedia standards for inclusion and to possibly improve the article. red dogsix (talk) 14:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * @reddogsix - Since "Significant coverage is certainly not a brief mention or two in a (sic) article", how many mentions and how lengthy do they have to be to be considered significant by "Wikipedia's" standards. Lyteon01 (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)