Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/OpenXava

Search in Google about "OpenXava" gives me a lot of original articles of third parties about it. At least for me in the first Google page result I get:

- https://jesuslc.com/tag/openxava/ - https://codigoxules.org/learning-project-openxava/ - https://www.adictosaltrabajo.com/2013/12/27/openxava/

Also in InfoQ, like this article: https://www.infoq.com/news/2007/02/openxava-release/

In third party book about Liferay has a part devoted to OpenXava in the chapter 6: https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Xinsheng-Chen/dp/1782162348/

OpenXava has 250.000 downloads you can confirm in SourceForge. Moreover, it is used by many companies: https://openxava.org/stories/

I'm just going to publish a story about a big university that uses OpenXava for teaching computing programming.

What do yo need to consider OpenXava relevant enough?


 * Hello, please sign your comments. Also, plase post your comments on Articles for deletion/OpenXava and not here to make sure everyone sees them. Subject needs to be notable to have an article about it. In this case, Wikipedia notability guidelines for software are the most relevant. Anton.bersh (talk) 10:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)