Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Open VOGEL

No clear reason for deletion and not clear if the decision was taken by only one user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuillermoHazebrouck (talk • contribs) 12:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @GuillermoHazebrouck Three people were involved. Please use WP:DRV if you want to dispute the closure. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

No, thanks. I am not wasting my time on it. I much prefer reading an article about Coca-cola. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuillermoHazebrouck (talk • contribs) 12:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, that's up to you, but why start this discussion then anyway? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:52, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Well, I am just confused because the open source project and software the article was pointing at is real. You can find information about a lot of similar engineering software (even comercial), not necessarily as an advertisement. So you should remove Nastran and Calculix also. I will not twist the decision because after this I don't think I'll keep contributing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuillermoHazebrouck (talk • contribs) 13:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @GuillermoHazebrouck Please read WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT, which were cited in the discussion, for more information on why your article was not accepted. The fact that a software "is real" is not enough to conclude that it warrants an article on Wikipedia. In particular, you did only cite Primary sources, and no secondary independent sources, which are required by Wikipedia's notability guidelines, could be found. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)