Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Opencola (company)

Oppose deletion
I oppose deletion of this article because of standard deletionist tactics. This article was in good shape, with good citations of reliable sources, somebody deleted the entire References section. This is a transparent fraud, designed to look like there were never any sources. This is disgusting behavior. I'm going to fix it. Lexein (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Lexein (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Also, procedurally, proposing editor did not even complete the deletion nomination, FAILING to even add a reason for deletion. FAIL! Not a fan. Lexein (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Mr. President, don't you have better things to do than hang out on Wikipedia? Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 07:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Nobody removed the references section, it was there all along called "References" and with a list. What you did was add a second one the  template which, rather than adding a References section, adds a notice saying "This article does not cite any sources". I've reverted your additional one addition now, and look, there's still a References section showing all the sources. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC) (Updated Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC))
 * Oh, and the reason is quite clearly there on the nomination page - it says "Not a notable subsidiary, consider merging if there is any material that is notable though." Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

I was using a mobile browser, apparently reglist isn't rendered correctly on mobile (en.m.wikipedia). That's why I was fooled into thinking it had been deleted. BUT: there's no evidence in any browser mode for your claimed isingness' reason for deletion.