Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Outside Bozeman

Lots of unfounded assumptions and inaccurate assertions by Glenfarclas, who seems to have as much of a bias against this page as its proponents do for it. If every entry required a New York Times article to be considered notable, Wikipedia would be a pale shadow of what it is now. And last time I checked, didn't Wikipedia give away its information for free? Hedgehog21 (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * My own view (and I have nothing to do with this magazine, maybe read it once, but not sure) is that there is an anti-rural and anti-western bias on wikipedia, if it isn't NYC then it's the boonies and thus unimportant. Rural areas have fewer people, but per capita matters. But that is just my opinion, though not without some evidence.  Montanabw (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)