Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/PCoIP

The products are definitely related to PCoIP technology. The idea is to provide links so that readers can get more details at the external links. Otherwise, this is going to be a long article. Why can't this article be a PCoIP technology article alone and has to be discussed in the desktop virtualization article? RDP, RGS, and etc all have their own articles. Why can't the PCoIP technology has it own? This posting is not a vehicle for refspam. Let me ask you this question. If you not a PCoIP expert, and you would like to get more information about it. Then you go to wikipedia, can you find any standalone article that describes what PCoIP technology is if this article is removed? The answer is clearly NO! So why would you want to stop readers from getting the details of what PCoIP technology is at Wikipedia? Also, what do you mean by it lacks reliable sources? Links and citations are included to Teradici who develops the technology and VMware where PCoIP protocol is the default protocol for the VMware View solution. If Jaes thinks this article should be removed, the only reason I see is that you don't want readers to get more information of what PCoIP is, and you don't like others editing your edits. BngWiki (talk) 05:22, 14 May 2010 (UTC)BngWiki