Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Paolo Cavallone

Skoufaki (talk) 20:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)The article about Cavallone seems well done and it certainly proves notability. The links are also very helpful to understand the importance of Cavallone's work. It is not clear why multiple issues related to additional citations are indicated. There is no doubt that he shoud be part of Wikipedia.

I don't understand why this page has been relisted. The article is fine. The links are very clear and prove notability.Gian Marco Mar (talk) 21:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)