Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Parish (Band) (2nd nomination)

This was clearly voted on at a previous AfD as KEEP, so why has it been deleted yet again? Why must someone who apparently missed that first vote get to now play God and delete someone's hard work for a second time? Yes, I freely admit that the connection between Parish and Crimson Glory could be (and has been) construed as tenuous at best by some, nevertheless, it is there!!! In spades, in my opinion.

Firstly, you have two members of not only an exceptionally influential band of the progressive metal genre (Crimson Glory), but also a band who were among the founding fathers of said genre... but secondly, they had an album released on Alfa, a major label in Japan and a subsiduary of a major North American label. So, in truth, they should satisfy not one, but two requirements.
 * Firstly, you should add this to the actual debate, not the talk page, secondly, please sign your posts by typing four tildes like this " ~ " at the end of your comments, thirdly, this debate was over almost a month ago, if you wish to appeal it, click here for deletion review. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Restoring blanked comments
Nice... it appears that TruSilver is insistent on deleting my work a second time, even after the first AfD votes a keep (unanimously, I might add) and I meet a notability requirement. Why are you being so pedantic about this? This entry more than satisfies WP:Music#6... namely, both Ben Jackson (and, my entry for his band has been killed as well, and that entry satisfied two requirements) and Dana Burnell had left Crimson Glory and formed a new band, namely Parish. If this was a "side project", I would have followed WP:UCS and not bothered. Whatever... 64.42.206.16 (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)