Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Personal rapid transit/UniModal

For the benefit of those who dispute this, the summary of input is as follows:
 * User:JzG]: Delete (merge acceptable if anything is verifiable)
 * User:Lar: Merge
 * User:Lurker: Merge
 * User:Avidor: Delete
 * User:Fresheneesz: Keep

The remaining unsigned and no-history input discounted, per normal practice, since the comments bear no relation to policy or guidelines. The user who suggested it should be about PRT and play down the Unimodal bit clearly was not aware that we already have an article on PRT. Just zis Guy you know? 08:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I want to note that this deletion ignored the input of 8 presumably independant individuals that embellished their vote with commentary - some rather complete comentary at that, unlike many votes on AfD. Only one of those commentary suggested that the information focus on PRT in general. My personal opinion was that this AfD closed far too quickly, and that the consensus was horribly misread. If anyone reads this in the next 100 years, please keep in mind that voting is not the end all in wikipedia - but it is a useful and very real part of consensus forming. Other AfDs should be more patient and try harder to form a real consensus before closing. Fresheneesz 09:11, 19 June 2006 (UTC)