Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Physical comparison of tigers and lions (1st nomination)

Repeated act of relisting
As per Relisting, articles should not be relisted when a consensus has taken place. There was already a lengthy discussion of a page that was nominated for deletion since the 20th of September, with no clear consensus, and this page had earlier been relisted on the 27th of September, so the best thing now is to close this as "no consensus". Under the rules, "relisting should not be a substitute for a "no consensus" closure. If the closer feels there has been substantive debate, disparate opinions supported by policy have been expressed, and consensus has not been achieved, a no-consensus close may be preferable." Since there already has been substantive debate, I have to decry the repeated act of relisting as WP:Abusive relisting. Leo1pard (talk) 15:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC)