Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pig mask

= Closing administrator's remarks = '''If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a separate section below. Do not break-up my comments here.'''

Raw count analysis

 * Delete
 * 1) Otto4711 (14 edits)
 * 2) Doctorfluffy
 * 3) Tevildo
 * 4) Masterpiece2000
 * 5) Revanche
 * 6) Ridernyc (8 edits)


 * Keep
 * 1) CyberGhostface (13 edits)
 * 2) Wageless (5 edits)
 * 3) Hobit
 * 4) Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
 * 5) Agent452 (3 edits)


 * Merge
 * to Jigsaw Killer
 * 1) Master of Puppets
 * 2) Lenin and McCarthy (2 edits)
 * 3) Jackel (said "delete then merge")


 * Non-participatory
 * 1) DGG (commented on process, but not article or subject)
 * 2) SineBot (doing what sinebot does)
 * 3) Jerry (relist without any commentary)

Delete arguments

 * fails WP:NOT
 * no reliable sources to establish real-world context
 * sources provided are not independant of the subject or are obviously biased towards it

Discounted delete arguments

 * another movie prop is more notable and doesn't have it's own article
 * no reason for this to have it's own article
 * the subject is not unique
 * no sources with critical commentary

Keep arguments

 * since nomination article has been improved to include subject's development outside of films, its impact on the series and on popular culture
 * a link provided in the article is a review of the subject
 * iconic part of notable film series
 * subject achieved a cultural presence that is independent of the movie
 * of interest to the reader, provides encyclopedic content

Discounted keep arguments

 * subject marketed as various consumer goods
 * subject shown in promotional materials for notable films in which it appears
 * article is well written
 * verifiable; concerns a recognizable aspect of a notable film series
 * sources are clearly there
 * seems notable
 * no harm caused by keeping this article
 * inherits notability from notable film series
 * if we delete it what will it's editors do?

As the nominator pointed-out several times during the course of this discussion, it was given ample time to reach consensus. This did not occur, however. Ergo: No consensus (default keep) JERRY talk contribs 02:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)