Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/PileInspect

Dear Roger and Imaginatorium, I really appreciate your comments and suggestions on Wikipedia page 'PileInspect'. As you said, the article is quite brief now and has not provided details of designs inside the proposed pile integrity system. We defeinitely have clear and detailed design of an integrated system, both on hardware development and signal processing algorithms. At this stage the project is in trial test, we have got ideal results as expected in the proposal. We are now preparing publications to report the results of project, the abstracts of which have been accepted by editors. Due to the need of copyright protection, we can not release some materials until the publications come out. We will be always ready to update the page by adding materials. Please could you allow this page leaving in Wikipedia as we really hope the article can be a good platform and discuss with all people who have interests. Your advices would be much appreciated.Zhenghaitao (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem is not that the article is brief, the problem is that it is not encyclopaedic: it reads like a research proposal, and Wikipedia is not a place to post your own proposals and similar, nor is it a "platform" for discussion. You need to show that this has been written about by third parties to establish "notability". There is also no real point in having this talk page: you can make comments on the deletion discussion to make sure they are read. Imaginatorium (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)