Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pippa Bartolotti

There are some terrible sourced stats here. Some are references to random blogspot blogs. This whole page really needs to be taken down.

This shows very cursory inspection of the entry. The stats check against Company House records and official election results. The main source blog was Bartolotti's own (the other contained refs to Company House and her other blogs), with some fanciful description of her career that ignored the fact of a former husband who set up and ran the family electronics companies she falsely says she'd founded. On what basis does she assert "malicious" entries - any neutral disclosure of her past would be portrayed by her as "malicious"; what factual material does she claim is faulty? Maxwallis (talk) 10:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Take it to deletion review if you wish - i don't think there is a consensus for delete, but there may be some BLP issues i don't know about. Szzuk (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)