Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Playtech BGT Sports

Why are a London StExCh RNS, Financial Times or an Annual Report of a PLC unreliable sources - can't agree on this. Regarding the 'UPE accusation': I've not been paid to create this article so don't see a COI. Happy to edit specific passages that might be too promo-like but don't agree on deletion suggestion. feel free to edit these passages or let me know and I'll do it.--Leebale (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I wasn't referring to those in particular- rather sources like prnewswire, intergameonline, gamingintelligence (press releases), calvinayre (where for example, the "article" is explicitly listed under the press releases section of website). Similarly, annual reports do not prove notability. As for the UPE accusation, it is very very rare for legitimate new users to create such a fully formed article in their first edit. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)