Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Plebvision

This is odd. This page is listed in a number of places as an 'interesting' page listed for deletion.

Why is it interesting? Is it that plebvision itself is interesting, or the notion of it, or is it the notion in the debate that such a word could be 'stripped of its POV'?

I think probably the latter. Some words are, in themselves, a point of view, describing them isn't really possible without recognising that. Is it?

Actually, I haven't been able to find the original page on plebvision - presumably the deletion voted upon took place at some time, so it is no more. It is a pity because, though I am pretty confident of what the word actually means, it would have been nice to see what it is claimed to mean. Do plebs have vision of their own, or is it more likely that it is provided by some instrument?