Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Plum Canary

Post-closing comment
After this discussion was closed, Radiant made the following comment:


 *  80% is a consensus to delete. See WP:VFU for debate. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 15:53, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

If any editor honestly believes that there was a 80% consensus to delete, that is a good enough reason for me to re-open the discussion. Please see Articles for deletion/Plum Canary (second nomination). --Tony Sidaway Talk 20:38, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Dpbsmith added this:
 * Delete as advertising, if the discussion is still open. If this discussion is not open, then I don't understand why Plum Canary still exists and links to this page. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

It's too late to participate in this discussion, and no the article does not point to this VfD. I see that you found your way to the second AfD eventually. The article still exists because we keep articles listed for deletion for which a consensus does not exist for deletion. --Tony Sidaway Talk 23:22, 4 September 2005 (UTC)