Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Praise and veneration of Muhammad

Comment on the note left by the closing admin: This admin seems to be one-eyed. He lists the reasons for deleting the article as follows:
 * 1) original research.
 * 2) content fork.
 * 3) aggregation of quotes.

But he fails to notice or to look at the comments that have addressed these 3 issues and refuted them very well. He failed to notice that the topic of the article is very encyclopedic and that books (such as this book) have been written and published just to cover this topic in particular. He fails to notice that the topic can't be covered in an article about Muhammad in Islam because it is a very popular topic and needs an article on its own. He fails to notice the comments by users saying that even if the content have some issues such as "aggregation of quotes", it's not supposed to get deleted but to get improved instead. The article was (as I saw it myself) sufficiently referenced and sourced and was certainly not an original research.

Finally, deleting the article has certainly increased the anti-Islam bias of wikipedia's content and labeled its claims of adhering to neutrality as "jokes".--94.58.144.127 (talk) 10:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)