Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Putin khuilo!

Vote stacking
Please note that and  have been blocked as ✅ sockpuppets of. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * is another one. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Weak keep

 * Weak keep It might turn out to be just a flash in the pan of no lasting significance, but it seems at least as notable as, say, Janet Jackson's nipple. But historical significance is rarely clear at the time; it could turn out to be as significant as We will bury you.  I found the article via mainstream news and came to WP for more background on the subject (specifically, a nuanced translation of хуйло).  The decision is only between a dedicated article, and a section in another one.  Personally I think there's enough material to justify a dedicated article, and thus oppose deletion, but it's not far over the line; I wouldn't be horribly upset if it got merged elsewhere. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 04:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Added. -- Neil N  talk to me  04:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Keep
It is a phenomenon and meme that started off as a Ukrainian local phenomenon, but as a result of the embassy incident got international attention, which justifies a separate article, also because often international journalists lack knowledge on the cultural context and history. Also compare the other 10 linguistic versions. --91.200.122.230 (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Keep
It is currently notable, and relevant to the current political events. It is mentioned in the news and other sources many times. --188.190.64.13 (talk) 21:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)