Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Queen Seonjeong

Close
now we have two votes from others editors, the close is not eligible. You are trying to shame the Korean queen's notability. Ok I will report you to ANI. VocalIndia (talk) 09:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * SKCRIT#1 says The nominator [...] fails to advance any argument for deletion or redirection [...] and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted or redirected.. This is what happened here - all !votes stated either "keep" or "procedural close", no editors disagreed with the 'nomination' statement in any way. I am not trying to "shame anyone's notability", and indeed have no opinion whatsoever on the matter at hand, I closed the AfD as it was invalid - AfD is not the venue to resolve content disputes such as this. The person advocating redirection should make an AfD nomination if they believe the subject is insufficiently notable and other people disagree - as I stated in my closure statement, if someone repeatedly goes against consensus and redirects an article, there are dispute resolution venues where that can be handled. AfD is not one of them. firefly  ( t · c ) 10:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)