Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Reading spark plugs for racing

Wikisource, from what I see is a disorganized wasteland of miscellaneous chatter. A place where anyone looking for this information will never find it. Therefore it may as well be deleted. That should satisfy the “handwringers” and the "delete on sight anything I know nothing about” crowds. Not to mention the vote was

1 Delete 1 Merge 2 Transwiki 2 Keep ...And transwiki wins?

When I heard of Wikipedia I thought, marvelous! Finally a source where someone can both find and contribute information that is ignored by other encyclopedias. A resource which has the potential to capture the vast knowledge of all aspects of the human experience. A COMPLETE reference (eventually in time). If it is to be just the same as all the others, who needs wikipedia? Encarta, Britannica and all the rest can do that job. What is encyclopedic? If it is only what is found in other encyclopedias and anything else is rejected then why waste time trying to add to it, knowing that the effort will be for nothing.

Not to mention the voters who couldnt possibly have even read the page before casting a vote. Too busy voteing I guess but hardly INFORMED or CONSIDERED votes.