Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Blaikie (second nomination)

Just a quick note here to review the numbers, in case anybody's unclear:


 * There were three keep votes, all of which indicated that merging into the party candidates list would also be acceptable.
 * There were no votes only to keep; there was one vote only to merge.
 * Counting the nomination, there were two delete votes.

So since nobody voted for a keep without the qualification that merging was also okay, I view the consensus here as merge vs. delete, and with 4 merges to two deletes, that exactly meets the unofficial 2/3 cutoff. Also, since the established precedent already favours the merge approach for unelected political candidates, I don't view this as an unduly controversial issue that needs to be left open for further input. If somebody wishes to reopen that precedent for further discussion, I'd welcome that — but as things currently stand, it is the precedent at this time. Bearcat 22:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)