Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Watson

NOTE This discussion is attracting votes from the site skepchick.org, where skepchickers are calling wikipedians (specially yours truly) "dicks", "idiot" and "fucktard" and other nasty adjectives. --Damiens .rf 02:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd like to point out that the thread mentioned above isn't attracting votes from non-wikipedians. It's specifically stated in that thread that people who wouldn't otherwise get involved shouldn't do so. And "deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments", no matter who makes them. Ole Eivind (talk) 04:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * How exactly is that pertinent to the discussion at hand? this is not a majority vote and the opinion that others hold of you is not considered when the decision is made to keep an article that is not about you and does not mention you. As I see it you posted that in order to prejudice any sort of authority figure against the keep crowd. You should try to remember that you are dealing with skeptics, and the skeptical movement is all about dismantling faulty arguments, it is unlikely that this sort of tactic will be allowed to slide by the skeptical community. --Brendan White (talk) 08:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Since it did not effect the actual discussion and was more a commentary on the wickedness of your detractors I moved the discussion to this section --Brendan White (talk) 09:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Note I have been around since July, I have edited articles on a radio host and farming techniques and doves, all completely unrelated to each other, none of them was on the leaders of the skeptical movement. You took no effort to look and see before you undid my edits. My level of editing skill comes from having accounts on several wiki's, and having had another account on wikipedia some time ago. Moving things back and removing tags is one thing, deleting my comments is another. I am going to report your behavior. Just because someone has beaten you in an argument is no excuse for you to label them with a tag that does not apply and delete where they showed you to be the incompetent and angry editor that you are. --Brendan White (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If you equate calling someone a dick and beating this person in an argument... I will no argument with you. --Damiens .rf 13:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The dick part is where you delete my posts, the beating you in an argument part is where I show with logic that your post is irrelevant. --Brendan White (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)