Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Red army crimes in Lithuania

Copied from project page
Comment: Since the author of the article has messed up the discussion by leaving comments all over the place, I have taken the liberty to copy his interventions and the text he commented on, here: ( --Pan Gerwazy 23:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC) )


 * Someone said the author of articel under discussion must leave answers after every disscussion part, "mess gatherer" say - there is only one place.

Wiki rules: debate is not only woting.Ttturbo 06:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The original author of the article under discussion doesn't have to leave any comments if he/she doesn't want to. The object of the exercise is that if the original author has a particular reason for wanting the article kept, he/she is welcome to advocate that. He/she should ideally explain that they have contributed heavily to the article, but that's a custom honoured more in the breach than the observance. Commenting after every single contribution is probably a bit much, particularly if there's nothing in particular to say. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Disappeared comment
Ttturbo put all his threaded comment back on the project page, but forgot to put my threaded comment back, which has now disappeared from both pages. I wrote:

- **Comment And now User:Ttturbo is edit-warring with several other editors there, trying to establish links to this article. Even using anonymous IP to avoid 3RR. I suppose a short block may be in order. --Pan Gerwazy 15:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Too bad that last one was a good prediction. --Pan Gerwazy 10:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)