Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Remote Viewing Timeline

Specifics please
Since the inception of the Remote Viewing Timeline, it has been subjected to an onslaught of generalized accusations of POV, Orignal Research, unverifiability, and, in the project page here, now is accused of "drawing conclusions" and "conspiracy."

On its own discussion page, and on the main Remote Viewing discussion page (where it was inappropriately brought up by another), I have asked repeatedly for any specific instance of any of the above. There has not been even one.

I have also responsibly answered accusations that were blatant falsehoods regarding sources.

To this moment I have not had one single quoted instance presented from the timeline itself that qualifies under even one of the leveled accusations.

In my life I have never been subjected to anything so resembling a kangaroo court or inquisition or lynch mob.

If there is any soul engaged in this gang beating who has the decency to do other than hurl generalized, unanswerable invectives, who has the intelligence and integrity and eloquence to cogently point out any specific thing in the timeline that is in violation of any Wikipedia policy, I would like to see him step forward with civility and present a coherent and reasoned case. I'll be here to respond in kind.

Otherwise, I suppose the lynch mob will have its way, and hang honest knowledge from the nearest branch.Huntley Troth 01:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)