Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination)

Clearly this AfD would benefit if only those comment who were not involved in the EEML case or are involved with the subject and main author of the article. Hopefully that will help avoid the battles we saw last time. For this reason I removed my delete comment (as I commented on the EEML case and as I had interacted with the main author), hoping that those who are involved will do the same. Let's see whether self-policing will work, as I do not intend to point out anyone involved and still commenting on this Afd (as is everyone's right). Pantherskin (talk) 10:54, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I was a victim of the EEML, so I have been involved, and have followed your suggestion. If the EEML buddies, who have filibustered previous Afds to "no consensus", are kept out this time, leaving the Afd to neutral editors, the article will meet its well-deserved fate anyway. -- Matthead Discuß   20:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)