Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sacred Heart School

DoubleBlue, I'd like to draw attention to your vote, and the link provided: verifiable and NPOV which actually points to Wikipedia_talk:Fame_and_importance. Rather than assuming that you're being devious, I'll keep faith. I'd secondly like to draw your attention to the manner in which Tony has comported himself with regards to editing my votes. I've listed the diffs and made notes on Tony's talk page. I've also shot my mouth off a little there, but being called a "liar", "disgraceful", and "dishonest" tends to piss people off. - brenneman (t) (c)  00:07, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Cute but not the same thing. If your link text was Arguments for deleting school article or some such, no one would suspect that you were attempting to be deceitful. For the record, I find it hard to believe that this was an attempt to deceive as it's rather ineffective and lame. What I found odd and worth discussing is why you doth protest so much about showing the anchor. Double Blue  (Talk) 06:10, 9 August 2005 (UTC)