Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Salvador Fernandes Zarco

I disagree with your erasing of this article. Why should popularity be a measure of how believable an argument is? If you ever read the book, you will find two things: First and foremost, arguments that make the genovese Columbus a ridiculous story on many accounts, rendering this version improbable to say the least. Second, quite a few arguments that point to a theory that may seem preposterous to someone taught the Genovese version, but that range from proved by documents, to probable, to far-fetched (the translation of his signature using the Caballa is highly disputable).

For these reasons I think this article should reinstated, to keep Wikipedia as an open-minded and non-judgemental source of information

213.30.21.26 (talk) 17:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Pedro Vozone Pedrovozone@yahoo.com