Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sam Chachoua

"Non-notable quack". Sounds like an ad hominem. Is that a valid criteria a for page deletion? Non-notable is rather subjective. Stanley Pons has his very own Wp page. I think some people would view a claim for a vaccine for HIV on US national TV as notable. IMO the best way to approach false claims is to show all the evidence that they are false, not to disparage, silence or delete information about the person making the claim.