Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sarah Knauss (3rd nomination)

An off topic humorous Old Testament digression
This discussion has been serious and is tending toward acrimony. Therefore, I note:

No one has yet compared her lifespan to the 969 years reportedly claimed for Methuselah. Putting aside the need for credible documentation, if we did she would be the third oldest. Happy holidays to you all. {:>{)> 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Or to Peng Zu. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 22:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Disenfranchising the voters
The article was kept. So I am well and fine with that. Interesting, the closer (User: Black Kite) says that the vote was 6-6 keep/delete. Nevertheless, there were 15 keeps. This is disenfranchisement on a scale befitting Republicans in North Carolina; remedial math is suggested. Moreover, there were only four deletes (not six), and one Delete/merge. The page speaks for itself. Res ipsa loquitur. Hanging chads anyone? Do we need a recount? 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 7&6, we've worked together before very productively, and I'm sure that will continue, but please cool it. AfD is not a vote, you know that, an you likely don't know the history of massive disruption from socks, meats, and maniacs of the "World's Oldest People" project -- see WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity/Evidence.
 * You've got a chance now to find more material that actually talks about Kanuss' life to fill out the article. Otherwise in due course it will be renominated under NOPAGE. This has nothing to do with notability. It's about how best to present what little there is worth saying about here life. EEng 21:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * There were a bunch of SPAs piling in, and they were properly discounted. Comparing this to disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of voters in a large polity to determine the course of its government for the next several years? Seriously?  That being said, renominating this yet again?  Sooner or later some people are going to wrap their heads around that in a consensus-based process, sometimes one's going to be on the losing side in the argument, and in that case, lose graciously and move on.   Ravenswing    01:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It didn't take disenfranchising thousands to effect the outcome here. Counting counts.  All wikipedians are equal, but some don't count for anything (if they are an IP, or even if they are a registered account that hasn't edited in a while.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)