Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Satyajeet Tambe (2nd nomination)

Goldsztajn has asked me to add some comments to my closure, because they think the sources they cited show notability. I'm not at all sure why Goldsztajn thinks I should comment on that. It would have been totally wrong had I based my closure on my personal view of the sources: my task was to assess the consensus of opinion of those who tool part in the discussion, and it is so obvious that there was a consensus to delete that I don't see what commentary or explanation anyone could reasonably want me to give. Nevertheless, as a favour to Goldsztajn, I have now had a look at the sources, and I shall comment on them.

It was a difficult and tedious job checking the sources, because I can't read either Marathi or Hindi, and for some reason I couldn't get Google to translate whole pages, and in the case of one of the cited sources I couldn't get it to translate at all. Consequently I had to copy and paste large numbers of little pieces of text into Google translate, but by doing so I was able to read the substantial majority of the text. None of what I saw was substantial coverage of Satyajeet Tambe. Some pages were merely telling us what he had said about something, in one case merely his comments praising someone who had died. In some pages it was very difficult to find any mention of him at all, any mentions there were being so hidden amongst far larger quantities of text about other matters.

Other comments by Goldsztajn are clearly irrelevant. Neither how long ago another article on the same subject was deleted nor who previously made a deletion nomination has any bearing whatever on the merits or demerits of the arguments put forward in this discussion. JBW (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC)