Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Second Treatise of the Great Seth

I am the person who wrote out the article from a non-copyrighted source here at Wiki.

Splash is a moron, this this article was written in 200 AD and is not copyright. This is a valuable resource and should not be deleted. Splash should be banned immediately and not allowed to copyright any further documents as he simply cannot control himself.

Cordially,

WritersCramp 13:34, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * No personal attacks on Wikipedia. And, if you want to contribute to the debate, your comment would be better placed on the actual project page (see toolbar at top) rather than the talk page. I am no longer contesting the copyright status of this, but am suggesting that the content is not appropriate for Wikipedia, and might be better placed in Wikisource which is a more natural home for this kind of thing. I've also sought advice at The Village Pump on this kind of thing &mdash; you might want to read that (brief discussion). -Splash 13:51, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

Splash get a life and go do something else.

WritersCramp 14:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)