Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Seema Rao

Please look at recent edits for Seema Rao while considering the deletion request
users such as user:Sholu123 have cleaned up some of the more audacious claims today, removing
 * "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8360192/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl|title='Equal: True Story of India's only Woman Commando Trainer'"
 * "ref name="India’s Wonder Woman - NEWJ">cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=pnPx0uFj8uU&feature=youtu.be|title='India’s Wonder Woman - NEWJ' | accessdate=2019-05-01|publisher=NEWJ"
 * ""DNA Article on Seema Rao!">{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/report-shy-another-day-india-s-1st-woman-commando-trainer-s-job-pushes-her-into-a-male-dominated-space-2282264 |title=Shy Another Day | accessdate=2017-06-25|publisher=DNA"
 * "Exclusive Interview With The Combat Specialist Couple Of India">{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=palXBgxtsVA|title=Combat Specialist Couple Of India| accessdate=2018-03-24|publisher=youtube.com"
 * "Pursuing an education in medicine, she certified as a doctor in conventional medicine. Rao also has an MBA in crisis management. She is an alumnus of Westminster Business School {citation needed|date=May 2020"
 * "She has been a Mrs India World beauty pageant finalist, too. A professional martial combat exponent"

I am assuming good faith for the edit, as Wikipedia mandates, but these claims and others presented should be kept in mind during this discussion.

Edit: I can no longer assume good faith for the edit due to the results of the following Sockpuppet Investigation — Preceding unsigned comment added by BasicsOnly (talk • contribs) 12:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles in attributing Look Promotional
I correspond with the other writers in the fever of Deletion of this promotional sheet. I have no individual solicitude or Issue with this couple at all. I have high respect for their hard work as they claim (if proven by them on the ground). BUT, The wiki may not be the right platform to create a promotional profile, Article.

The Article miscarries Precedence (notable) and trustworthiness of most utmost of the links stated in the Testimonial segment. I completely agree with the point of view of Sir BasicsOnly and Sir Materialscientist. I am late to Wikipedia but an old soul on the planet of Internet and Internet Etiquettes (Protocols). I concur with my superiors and esteemed advisors (Sir BasicsOnly and Sir Materialscientist ). They are senior guides who have designated points to a farthest professional manner. I do click with all genuine concerns and axiom of complete clean up of Promotional Profiles from Wikipedia. Another legitimate solicitude is one of the profiles who is bootlegging all links repeatedly to the answers and yielding the erudition as it is the same person. One of the Raos?. That is not an argument for me at a secluded level but of direction, would be at Professional Front for sure. Let's come in the unrestricted and have a fair consideration in regards to the Testimonials have been claimed in Articles. Let us have a legitimate prospect to comprehend this couple better with the official records. There are a lot of claims/Rumours about the unsaid unwanted charges on them? But as far as the Notability is provided and the Wiki policy is NOT misused and formed, I do not have an Issue, But for the next time. This time I correspond with the Seniours and propose to ==Delete==.

Must Delete as maximum Articles in attributing Look Promotional
DeepaMourya (User talk:DeepaMourya) 19:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)