Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sexy Vegan

Deprecated clickbait/tabloid sources?

 * Just an aside (not merely about "Sexy Vegan"), but if Newsweek and Yahoo News are posting clickbait/tabloid stuff, then should they be considered deprecated sources? I ask because if I'm creating future articles, I can then remember to skip those two sources as a reference and avoid using them. PetSematary182 (talk) 18:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Newsweek is more or less deprecated with special conditions. Yahoo frequently reposts press releases, you just have to look at bylines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know. I will try to be more careful with these sources in any possible future articles. I had always thought Newsweek was a good source; sad to know it's now stooping to sensationalism, but I guess it' changed. PetSematary182 (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It was actually a Fatherly piece, not a Yahoo News piece. Generally "digital lifestyle brands" don't make for reliable sources, and even if it was the single mention of or an unhinged personality who called himself simply “Sexy Vegan.” is not WP:DUE to use in an article about a BLP. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:35, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment By making this a level 2 section header, you have broken the formatting of the log page. It has been downgraded to level 4. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 18:35, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for fixing that. I'm sorry; I must've typed the formatting wrong. PetSematary182 (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)