Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming

I've just realised that Articles for deletion/Hell and High Water ended as keep. Arguably it should die as non-notable too? William M. Connolley 22:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, at least that book was reviewed in the Toronto Star (a clear step up from the Toronto Sun, interestingly). The article itself suffers from book-report tone (as does Shattered Consensus), which I why I think these kind of articles are a bad idea in general, but that's not necessarily a deletable offence in and of itself. On the other hand, does one mainstream review make the book notable? My gut says no, but AfD said yes... I guess if anyone felt strongly, it could be re-listed with a more detailed rationale for deletion. MastCell 22:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)