Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shepard Ambellas

The article Shepard Ambellas just reached it's 30 day mark on Wikipedia. Criticism are vague as to Notability & Reliable Sources. Shepard Ambellas receives 48,900 results from doing a simple search. The original issues with the article are:
 * This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. (January 2013)
 * This article does not cite any references or sources. (January 2013)
 * This article appears to be written like an advertisement. (January 2013)
 * The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (January 2013)

Before allowing any correction or edits to address these issues, you have rapidly come along to delete the article.
 * This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.

Objectively, without even allowing the suggested edits to be made it appears the Alternative Media nature of Shepard Ambellas is the actual target. Can you address why you have aggressively marked the article for deletion without even one concrete suggestion?

Follow my logic: Grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling are simple to correct given time to do so. The article has numerous citations / links to third-party sources although the formatting may not be correct. These corrections are slated to be made asap. That is a somewhat personal interpretation and the language "appears" substantiates that fact. It either IS an advertizement or it IS NOT. This is a style issue and the article can be cleaned up as that is likely to be the intent of that criticism. The Notability Guidelines criticism is where edit can be made to demonstrate that Shepard Ambellas as an article DOES meet the Notability Guidelines.
 * This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. (January 2013)
 * This article does not cite any references or sources. (January 2013)
 * This article appears to be written like an advertisement. (January 2013)
 * The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (January 2013)

Taken in total, the issues seem to be primarily style and presenting links and formatting the article properly. Can you address the question asked as to the aggressive position that you've taken to mark "considered for deletion"?

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the Guide to deletion.