Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shut down period

While Shut Down Period could be considered original research, it is definitely notable as it has evolved into a well-known if somewhat localized phenomenon. I will remove the entries that truly are nonsense in the hopes that the essence of truth will be allowed to remain. --Tanner 19:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The common standards for determining if any article is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia include such things as verifiability, original research, importance, and notability. Please see What Wikipedia is not and Articles for deletion for additional details. If you want to save this article, please discuss how the article meets these criteria. -- Argon233&ensp;  T &ensp; C  @ &ensp; &para;   &ensp; 20:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

As a part creator of the shut down period page, I can verify the fact that this term and action are really being used by student as Bayside Secondary school and is something that all the students treasure and cherish —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.38.189.28 (talk • contribs) 2006-04-28 04:22:47.

Truth of Shut Down Period
Shut Down Period is indeed true. Although some parts have gone to the degree of being pointless, there are many truths behind the warped views of Shut Down Period. I ask the Admins of Wikipedia to allow the creators of this article to modify the contents of this entry to meet the criteria of Wikipedia. Please allow the creators 7 additional days to modify and change the contents. I assume that upon completion, the revised article will be sumbitted to the Admins of Wikipedia for approval. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dearka (talk • contribs) 2006-04-28 04:22:47.

"Truth" is not the only issue with this article, and efforts to cleanup this article may be in vain if you do not consider some other very important issues. Anyone intrested in saving Shut down period would be wise to read the following articles very carefully: Good luck. -- Argon233&ensp;  T &ensp; C  @ &ensp; &para;   &ensp; 04:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
 * Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day
 * Articles for deletion
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * No original research
 * Verifiability
 * Importance
 * Notability

Although I remain adamant about my belief in the truth of Shut Down Period, I am forced to admit that we seem to have no means by which to satisfy the criteria for Verifiability. --Tanner 18:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)