Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sorce theory

It is my opinion that the archived discussion for deletion of Sorce theory shows rather clearly a lack of 'neutrality' on the subject by at least one wikipedian. Furthermore, I do not believe that the discussion has been resolved, especially having shown that Wiki's own guildelies/policies are in favor of keeping the article on Sorce theory. Yet less then 24 hours after this was shown, the response was to casually disregard Wiki's own policies/guidelines and label them as irrelevant and change them to suit a biased opinion. (This is contradictory to the existance of the Wiki guidelines and policies in the first place). Following this, the discussion for deletion was closed and archived and the article on Sorce theory deleted. Historically, such unfair practices have been shown to be the domain of highly religious and close minded individuals, and as such can only be detrimental to the level quality of information that Wikipedia may otherwise achieve. Gseletko 04:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comment; if you wish to formally contest the deletion please do so at WP:DRV. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-01 04:47Z 
 * Thank you for the bump in the right direction. This experience has been most educational. Gseletko 10:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)