Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Stanley Leopold Fowler

Proposed Deletion
I have looked at the statements made above.regarding this article that was proposed for deletion before, then taken off deletion and now proposed for deletion again. As I stated before, there are articles written in the 70's about the building of the Elizabethan Village and Leo Fowler. No one took the time nor effort to publish much about him but this doesn't discredit the fact that the Elizabethan Village is still standing in Armadale, that the blueprints are in the Shakespeare's Birthplace Trust, that there is documented footage made at the time supporting the journey, there is a plague dedicated to Leo Fowler officially recognizing the Elizabethan Village as a historic site, there is a room renamed Leo Fowler''s Function Center  and the facts stated in the text were true and supported by images. He isn't a saint nor have I written about him in a sanctimonious way. I have given the facts from various sources that, by the looks of it, are deemed 'unreliable'. The articles mentioned above were forwarded to your permissions section and a permission has to be obtained to put the images of the plaque from the City of Armadale. There is a thread that is on wiki regarding this  [Ticket#2017012910007647].

I appreciate the kind guidance of all in wikipedia when the article was suggested for deletion initially. This new deletion however was notified today and in a couple of hours most of the article was deleted and left incoherent and incomplete with no guidance or discussion to improve, unlike the first time.And if I have seen correctly, many of the articles on wikipedia are improved and edited by others before they are deleted (even your own) There is no COI, there is no disputed neutrality- there are facts of an incredible journey. The timber was measured to the exact measurements on the blueprints of the original buildings, it was built exactly how they would have built it in Shakespeare's time, the thatched roof together with antiques were shipped from UK and, and, and. Unless you, who deem it 'unrelible can prove otherwise, I will stand corrected. I have witnessed the blueprints at the trust in Stratford-upon-Avon too.

So, to conclude, can the same article that has already been taken off deletion, be proposed for deletion again? And if so, is there a limit to how many times the same article can be proposed for deletion then taken off again? Thewayweis (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that you still don't understand how Wikipedia works, it is difficult for new editors I must admit. Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject have published about it in reliable places. So anything I or you "know" about a subject is irrelevant, we just need to report on what the reliable sources say and nothing else. The WP:AFD process runs for 7 days after which an admin will decide using wikipedias policies and guidelines whether to keep or delete the article. Theroadislong (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * , you've gone above and beyond in your explanations. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Stanley Leopold Fowler
I did not write the article I was contacted by thewayweis who lives in England for accurate information about my father I then gave them the accurate information about him..I can only imagine how upsetting it was for thewayweis to see what was done with out advise from the cretics with out helpful advice that was asked for.From what I saw of the article they put up,Most of the content they had used was ruthfully removed .I was horrified that it was treated it such where was the advice on how to rectify the article? As Stanley Leopold Fowler's youngest Daughter I also lived in that area when my father came to Austrslia as I was a resident of Amadale at that time.I was involved with its building my husband helped my father build the replicas.The are taken from accurate Blue Prints of the original buildings in England .I opened the Histroy room there in 2009 having flew there from Queensland.I would have thought if it needed work thewayweis should have been given the weekend at least to change and put in order the artical as it was still under discussion. I am upset because it now effects the memory of my father and as I had been asked by the Shakspeare Birthplace Trust to allow them to put these in there achives for posterity and for consultation to keep the original buildings standing in England I flew there from Australia in June 2013 to take them over and talk with the Trust. The drawings are the only accurate drawing in existence of the building .its a pity that thewayweis was not helped in there endeavour to produce the artical with helpful advice before removing their  research .I can only imagine how upsetting it was.Also for me as his daughter to see unkind comments about my father's hard work. Due to his ill health after years of physically working to build them and to make sure was it was perfected .He passed my mother sold it and I feel sad to see it not as my father wished it to be. A place for Austrslians to see some Elizabethan culture.As for comments about the work he did that also seems cruel and uncalled for.

.

Sally-Ann Fowler (talk) 09:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)