Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Adams

Moved from AfD page
User GODDESSY is via her own admittance the person of who this Wikipedia article is about (Stephanie Adams). User Goddessy has been blocked and banned by several moderators and administrators. User Goddessy has made several severe Personal Attacks and been warned and kept attacking.

No credible RELIABLE verifiable information on this Wikipedia article except that Stephanie Adams was in a fact a Playboy model. No reliable verifiable evidence at all about love life, partners and or business. While Stephanie Adams may be notable only for appearing in Playboy, her business, her lovers are certainly not notable.

The User GODDESSY was BANNED http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:GODDESSY

and continued to make the Wikipedia article via a sockpuppet IP http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=68.161.222.151

User GODDESSY continues to harrass and make libelous and Personal comments about users who edit the page with verifiable facts.

Previous Deletion Requests: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GODDESSY

I vote Delete per Vanity and Wikipedia Rules and Standards WP:BIO and WP:VAIN and WP:WEB

Please read the Talk Page to see how GODDESSY handles people who edit "her private Wikipedia article" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stephanie_Adams

Read it all it's a good chuckle.

JuliannaRoseMauriello 20:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment this is the wrong forum for this complaint. It should be removed and taken to the appropriate venue - probably the administrators noticeboard. Gw e rnol 20:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

GODDESSY is not Stephanie Adams. That statement alone is FALSE.

GODDESSY was temporarily banned because of a person who unjustifiably did so and that problem was rectified.

GODDESSY made minor edits to the page and for some reason, this user has a problem with what was already approved even by the creator of this web site. (Refer back to the log of people who edited.)

The user above seems to be taking this issue all too personally due to the fact her edits were not accurate and eventually became vandalism.

Take a look at her history of changing and deleting comments made by us as proof of her lack of credibility.

Here is a note we wrote to the person who intervened recently:

"The comments made by User:JuliannaRoseMauriello are inaccurate. The revisions made to the page were fine, but for some reason she decided to commit vandalism by lowering the quality of the content.

GODDESSY is not looking for free advertisement and is quite content being a resource page for the media. GODDESSY atually preferred not to have anything mentioned other than the fact that it was founded by Miss Adams, which is why we removed mentionings of that previously (which several other people tried to place back up again).

User:JuliannaRoseMauriello has been reported on numerous accounts and removed the reports (which we put back up again). We will make one final revision to the page being discussed and hope that it stays as is.

-GODDESSY"

We would like to have this matter resolved once and for all by blocking User:JuliannaRoseMauriello from editing the Stephanie Adams page again.

-GODDESSY

(NOTE: Speak to Jim Wales about this and he will confirm a conversation with the subject a few days ago.)

Hey GODDESSY... People here don't fall for much BS... Just a heads up, you cannot lie to Admins on here. (Like throwing around Jim Wales name) JuliannaRoseMauriello 20:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)