Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Steve Comisar (2nd nomination)

This is just to point out that it was never my intention to imply that the subject wanted the article deleted only that he objected strongly to its contents and that there was no hope of him being happy with any neutral version that stuck to to the notable facts and excluded his preferred non-notable facts. That said, I realise now that anybody reading my second comment without the first might have misunderstood it in that way. This was poor writing on my part not any attempt to mislead. Anyway, I don't object to the outcome. It clearly reflects the consensus. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)