Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Stott's Theorem of The Pictorial Condition

Tim Templeton says that there is nothing on google regarding the phrase 'transcendental imaging' I've been no.1 in google for this phrase for years including today. There's a PhilPapers link and an Intellect books link and a blog link and more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Van Carloads (talk • contribs) 22 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The problem with the article is that you are the only one talking about it. We do not publish original research, as in articles on ideas, people or organizations that have not been written about extensively by others. Nobody else has written about this particular concept or reviewed the theory. If you have evidence of independent coverage, bring it forward. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:59, 22 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The article was published as a peer-reviewed academic paper in a major UK academic publishing concern and there are other articles on Wikipedia under that publishing house.


 * The patent application has been reviewed BY THE GOVERNMENT as acceptable for publication as a patent app.


 * It's not original research as presented, the patent app was 2006 and the article 2011 and it's on PhilPapers, a major site.


 * There are lots on entries on wikipedia that have not been 'written about extensivley by others,' that's pure philistinism, that something is only valid according to a popularity index. If that were forever and always the case, then no knowledge extension would ever happen. It's putting a brick on a sapling.


 * 'transcendental imaging' has been no.1 on google/bing/yahoo for over five years, it can't get more to the top than the top!!!!!!!!


 * This is a valuable resource of fact that I'm putting on wikipedia via this page entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Van Carloads (talk • contribs) 20:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * There are lots of places where you can get your own website to promote your theories. Wikipedia only publish articles on ideas/people/organizations that have been extensively written about by others. None of the editors at the deletion discussion found any evidence that anyone has written anything on the subject. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, on these kind of pages we don't discuss on the talkpage, but on the projectpage Articles for deletion/Stott's Theorem of The Pictorial Condition. The talkpage here is rarely used/looked at by anybody, but could be used for technical or policyquestions. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)