Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Survival capital

Last year when I started with master work I have found about 200 Internet online locations with Survival Capital topic ,with different degrees of independence of the concept Eg Survival Capital,,,Capital in Surviving ... Capital ....Survive  .Six month later I have found 400 Internet locations with same topic and much more articles using  Survival Capital as construct.The things are moving so quickly to the fact that Survival Capital is reality of contemporary existential practice and my master work is dedicated to importance of this concept for our civilization .Thanks to people who are not deleting  our reality ,who  recognize and have a vision.

If Wikipedia is Encyclopedia for informations that are "...already known and notable" than Wikipedia is running after other mass media and Wikipedia is media  that did nor recognize presence of concept yet or just hesitate to be the first Encyclopedia to do it.I understand.But Wikipedia has the chance to be the  first because of its nature  and position-encyclopedia with modern and actual access. Wikipedia, please just type Survival Capital in eg google and you should found 400 or more articles. I know that some of them are not point of this  article but  are  "some" important for  deleting this article more than all others? Everybody heard and feel familiar with this notion,even my 10 year old neighbor.Survival Capital is interesting for the whole modern World and process made a notion to be mature for encyclopedia  and supported by it. I told before that there are no definitons of Survival Capital and this is the point of my master work which is not important here.But there are descriptions which  underline value and function of concept for people and institution using this concept on Internet  again and again and again ...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.65.73 (talk) 06:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC) <!--Autosigned by SineBot-- The article presents concept Survival Capital as it is known and notable yet.Article is not representing original side of the concept which  should be done soon .Every notion was original once.